Healthy responses, broken billing
The worst bugs return success. No stack trace, no Sentry page, no failed test. Just users who can't complete the flow. They don't file tickets - they leave.
[02] Web stack
Any framework, any deploy, any CMS
[03] The journey-level gap
The bug your tests miss
is the one your customers find
The bug isn't in your code. It's in the journey - between auth provider, your app, Stripe, your webhook handler. Each piece works alone. The chain breaks. Standard tests don't follow the chain.
Their changelog. Your incident.
Your stack has more vendors than engineers. Each one ships when they want. Their API changes are not on your release calendar.
Manual QA doesn't scale
Three PRs a day, four critical flows, six viewports, two auth states. Nobody runs that matrix manually - and the ones you skip are the ones that break.
[04] Per-regression evidence
Every regression, fully recorded
When a journey breaks, you don't get a stack trace and a vague screenshot. You get the recording, the step-by-step trace, screenshots, and a check status posted to the pull request that caused it.
- 01Full browser session recording of the journey
- 02Step-by-step pass/fail breakdown of every action
- 03Screenshots captured at each key moment
- 04Clear bug report with reproduction context
- 05Pull request comment + GitHub check status
[05] How it works
Four steps to journey-level QA for your web app
Point us at staging, describe your critical flows in plain language, and let TesterArmy catch regressions on every release - before your customers do.
Connect GitHub
staging.yourapp.com
Create a project
Paste your staging or production URL to set up a project for your SaaS. Works with Next.js, React, Vue, or any framework. No SDK, no test scripts, no infrastructure to maintain.
Any frameworkURLGitHub
staging.yourapp
user@test.com
Submit
Write tests in plain English
Describe what to test in natural language. "Sign up with email, complete onboarding, add a payment method, upgrade to Pro." No DSL, no SDK.
Natural languageNo SDKNo DSL
GitHub AppAuto on deploy
Production monitoringRecurring runs
WebhookAny CI pipeline
Run on every PR
GitHub App posts a check on every pull request. Vercel preview integration runs the journey against each preview deploy. Schedule cron runs against production as a safety net.
GitHub AppVercel previewPR check
PassSearch results
Query returns the correct filtered items and pagination controls work as expected
Get a clear report
Get screenshots, recordings, and actionable bug reports on every run, from the dashboard, via the CLI, or straight in your Pull Request.
RecordingScreenshotsBug report
[06] Resources
TesterArmy in action
Explore real bug finds, QA tips, and client case studies from our work in practice.
June 10, 2026Inside Playwright CLI: Browser Automation Built for Coding Agents
Playwright CLI is a thin wrapper around a daemon that reuses the exact same tool layer as Playwright MCP - minus the token cost. Here's how it works under the hood and how to use it well.
June 6, 2026How to Handle Authentication in Playwright E2E Tests
Stop logging in through the UI before every Playwright test. Use storageState, keep one real login test, isolate roles, and make stale auth fail loudly in CI.
[07] FAQ
Web testing, answered
Yes. We test the rendered app in a real browser - the framework you used to build it is transparent to us. Next.js, React, Vue, Svelte, Rails, Django, and plain HTML all work the same way.
Yes - via the TesterArmy GitHub App or a webhook from your CI. You get pass/fail check statuses and report links right on each pull request, plus a one-click rerun.
Yes. Provide test credentials (email/password, magic link, SSO callback) and the journey starts authenticated. We can also persist sessions across runs if your auth flow is rate-limited.
Yes. Our agent comes with its own inbox. Plug it in as the email for any flow that needs verification, and the journey reads the message, clicks the link, and finishes.
Different layer. Playwright and Cypress are frameworks - you write and maintain the tests. TesterArmy is a service - you describe the journey, we run it, maintain it, and ship evidence on every release. The same browser primitives underneath, but no flaky selectors and no test code in your repo.
Yes. Each journey runs across a configurable set of viewports - desktop, tablet, and mobile breakpoints. Visual regressions in any of them surface as separate failures.
Customers shouldn't be your QA
TesterArmy runs the journeys your customers measure you on. On every release. So the next broken flow shows up in a PR check, not a support ticket.
[08] Contact us
